Posts Tagged ‘logic’
The central chapter of Kimhi’s Thinking and Being wanders far into the Aristotelian weeds – arguing that consistent misreadings of the notion of being in Aristotle’s work has closed the possibility which Kimhi has attempted in the first half of the book to re-open – namely that thought must be considered as a two-way capacity for action. […]
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment
Tags: Aristotelian logic, assertion, Frege, irad kimhi, logic, WIttgenstein
This will be a first in a series of posts as we read through Kimhi’s book. I am going to write up some notes while reading through Kimhi’s Thinking and Being. I have written about it generally before here and here. Building off of Paramenides famous philosophical fragment Kimhi wants to (potentially) realign the entire enterprise of […]
Filed under: ontology | Leave a Comment
Tags: analytic continental divide, greek thought, irad kimhi, logic, Paramenides, predication
Returns, Divides, and Bridges
I am going to start writing on this blog again since I no longer have an immediate philosophy community and it’s at least one way to not go completely insane. What is occupying my time these days is trying to work through the analytic/continental divide (instead of merely talking about it as a problem to […]
Filed under: Hegel, history, Kant, Meillassoux, ontology, Speculative Realism | 1 Comment
Tags: analytic continental divide, bosanquet, ci lewis, cs peirce, Hegel, josiah royce, kimhi, logic, Meillassoux
Naught Thought 