<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarification/Contestation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/</link>
	<description>Dark Vitalism - Towards a Nihilistic Speculative Realist Philosophy of Nature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:48:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Brighton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/?p=517#comment-754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excelent, I&#039;ll definately look into both of those - Thanks heaps, Ben.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excelent, I&#8217;ll definately look into both of those &#8211; Thanks heaps, Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Woodard</title>
		<link>http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Woodard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/?p=517#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A return to Plato in Grant&#039;s sense - this is a Plato of the Timaeus - the Plato who discusses dark matter.
Plato is particularly useful in attempting to grasp ideas given an all encompassing nature - as a form of becoming so that ideas are &#039;out there&#039; but not as timeless forms but very slow moving processes - (see chapter 6 of Grant&#039;s Philosophies of Nature after Schelling.)

If you are interested in Plato&#039;s treatment of poets you should take a look at Judith Balso&#039;s work...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A return to Plato in Grant&#8217;s sense &#8211; this is a Plato of the Timaeus &#8211; the Plato who discusses dark matter.<br />
Plato is particularly useful in attempting to grasp ideas given an all encompassing nature &#8211; as a form of becoming so that ideas are &#8216;out there&#8217; but not as timeless forms but very slow moving processes &#8211; (see chapter 6 of Grant&#8217;s Philosophies of Nature after Schelling.)</p>
<p>If you are interested in Plato&#8217;s treatment of poets you should take a look at Judith Balso&#8217;s work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Brighton</title>
		<link>http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Brighton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/?p=517#comment-752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A Return to Plato which I am all for&quot; - how so? I&#039;m curious. With the precedents that underlie your work and their often militant disavowal of Plato, this could be very very interesting - not to mention the anthropocentricism (and monoculturalism) of Platonic formalism, and the fact that I take his damnation of poets far too personally.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Return to Plato which I am all for&#8221; &#8211; how so? I&#8217;m curious. With the precedents that underlie your work and their often militant disavowal of Plato, this could be very very interesting &#8211; not to mention the anthropocentricism (and monoculturalism) of Platonic formalism, and the fact that I take his damnation of poets far too personally&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Actants, Ontology, and Epistemology &#171; Larval Subjects .</title>
		<link>http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/2010/02/18/clarificationcontestation/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Actants, Ontology, and Epistemology &#171; Larval Subjects .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naughtthought.wordpress.com/?p=517#comment-751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] discusses speculative realism. Already Ennis&#8217;s post has generated a lot of discussion (here, here, here, and here). Without repeating Harman&#8217;s own remarks, I wanted to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] discusses speculative realism. Already Ennis&#8217;s post has generated a lot of discussion (here, here, here, and here). Without repeating Harman&#8217;s own remarks, I wanted to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
